Clinical Physiology of Circulation

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery


Результаты протезирования митрального клапана механическими и биологическими протезами у пациентов с синусовым ритмом и постоянной формой фибрилляции предсердий

E-mail: Сведения доступны для зарегистрированных пользователей.

Link: Clinical Physiology of Blood Circulaiton. 2012; (): -

Full text:  

References

Барбараш Л. С., Барбараш Н. А., Журавлева И. Ю. Биопротезы клапанов сердца: проблемы и перспективы. Кемерово, 1995.
Бокерия Л. А., Каграманов И. И., Кокшенев И. В. Новые биологические материалы и методы лечения в кардиохирургии. М.: НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2002.
Дземeшкевич С. Л. Биопротезы клапанов сердца: причины и патогенез кальцификации // Биосовместимость. 1994. Т. 2, № 4. С. 165.
Малиновский Н. Н., Константинов Б. А., Дземешкевич С. Л. и др. Биологические протезы клапанов сердца. М.: Медицина, 1988. С. 84-88.
Сулимов В. А., Голицын С. П., Ревишвили А. Ш. и др. Диагностика и лечение фибрилляции предсердий. Рекомендации ВНОК и ВНОА. М.: ВНОК, 2011. С. 10.
Akins С. W. D., Miller C., Turina M. I. et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 85. P. 1490-1495.
Bonow R. O., Carabello B. A., Chatterjee K. et al. 2008 Focused upd ate incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons // Circulation. 2008. Vol. 118. P. 523-661.
Bortolotti U., Milano A., Mossuto E. et al. Porcine valve durability: a comparison between Hancock Standard and Hencock II bioprostheses // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 216-220.
Cen Y., Glower D. D, Landolfo K. et al. Comparison of survival after mitral valve replacement with biologic and mechanical valves in 1139 patients // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 122. P. 569-577.
Czer L. S., Matloff J. M., Chaux A. et al. Comparative clinical experience with porcine bioprosthetic and St. Jude valve replacement // Chest. 1987. Vol. 91. P. 503-514.
David T., Ivanov J., Cohen G. et al. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hencock II bioprotesis // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 121, № 2. P. 268-278.
Demirag M., Kirali K., Еmeroglu S. W. et al. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude medical and biocor valves // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2001. Vol. 10. P. 78-83.
Eberlein U., von der Emde J., Rein J., Esperer H. D. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications after mitral valve replacement // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1990. Vol. 4. P. 605-612.
Fradet G. J., Jamieson W. R., Abel J. G. Clinical performance of biological and mechanical prostheses // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 453-458.
Jamieson W. R. E., Lipinski O., Miyagishima R. T. et al. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 129, № 6. P. 1301-1308.
Hammermeister K. E., Sethi G. K., Henderson W. C. et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000. Vol. 36. P. 1152-1158.
Hanania G., Michel P. L., Montely J. M. et al. The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years // Arch. Mal. Coeur Vaiss. 2004. Vol. 97. P. 7-14.
Holper K, Wottke M., Lewe T. et al. Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: Benefits and risks // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 60. P. 443-446.
Kassai B., Gueyffier F., Cucherat M. et al. Comparison of bioprosthesis and mechanical valves, a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000. Vol. 8. P. 477-483.
Kawachi Y., Tokunaga K. Clinical comparative study between mitral mechanical and bioprosthetic valves - what is the benefit of bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position // Jpn Circ. J. 1990. Vol. 54. P. 1525-1534.
Кirchhof P., Auricchio A., Bax J. et al. Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) //Eur. Heart J. 2007. Vol. 28. P. 2803-2817.
Khan S. S., Trento A, DeRobertis M. et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 122. P. 257-269.
Kulik А., B
Kurlansky P. A., Williams D. B., Traad E. A. et al. The valve of choice in elderly patients and its influence on quality of life: a long-term comparative study // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2006. Vol. 15. P. 180-189.
Nаshef S. A., Se thia B., Turner M. A. et al. Bjork-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1987. Vol. 93. P. 394-404.
Oxenham H., Bloomfield P., Wheatley D. J. et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses // Heart. 2003. Vol. 89. P. 715-721.
Prasongsukarn K., Jamieson W. R., Germann E. et al. Aortic and mitral prosthetic valve replacement in age groups 61-65 & 66-70 years / Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2007. Vol. 15. P. 127-133.
Rahimtoola S. H. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003. Vol. 41. P. 893-904.
Riess F. C., Cramer E., Hansen L. et al. Clinical results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010. Vol. 37. P. 145-153.
Sidhu P., OKane H., Ali N. et al. Mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the elderly: a 20-year comparison // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001. Vol. 71. P. 257-260.

 If you found mistakes, select text and press Alt+A