Научно-практический журнал
«Клиническая физиология кровообращения»

ISSN 1814-6910 (Print)
ISSN 2410-9134 (Online)

 

Главный редактор

Лео Антонович Бокерия, доктор медицинских наук, профессор, академик РАН и РАМН, президент ФГБУ «НМИЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева» МЗ РФ


Каталог статей ➤ КФК. 2024; 21 (2): 89-162 ➤ Методы диагностики инфекции сосудистых протезов

Методы диагностики инфекции сосудистых протезов

Авторы: Бокерия Л.А., Иванов А.В., Абдулгасанов Р.А., Иванова Е.В.

Организация:
ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева» Минздрава России, Москва, Российская Федерация

Для корреспонденции: Сведения доступны для зарегистрированных пользователей.

Раздел: Обзоры

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1814-6910-2024-21-2-93-106

УДК: 616.13/14-089.844:616.9

Библиографическая ссылка: Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2024; 21 (2): 93-106

Цитировать как: Бокерия Л.А., Иванов А.В., Абдулгасанов Р.А., Иванова Е.В.. Методы диагностики инфекции сосудистых протезов. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2024; 21 (2): 93-106. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2024-21-2-93-106

Ключевые слова: инфекция сосудистого протеза, диагностика инфекции, компьютерная томография, ультразвуковое исследование, магнитно-резонансная томография, позитронно-эмиссионная томография

Поступила / Принята к печати:  30.05.2024 / 21.06.2024

Скачать (Download)


Аннотация

Инфекция сосудистых протезов и заплат – наиболее тяжелое осложнение в сосудистой хирургии, в значительной степени связанное с неблагоприятным прогнозом и высокой летальностью. Частота заболевания варьирует от 1,5 до 6% и зависит от расположения протеза, патогена, интервала времени после операции, сопровождается высокой летальностью (50–90%). Инфекция артериальных протезов встречается у 4% больных, аорты – у 1–3%, сопровождается потерей конечностей и высокой летальностью (более 20%). Своевременная диагностика инфекции имеет решающее значение в лечении и ведении пациента. На сегодняшний день нет стандартизированных диагностических алгоритмов и единого решения в отношении диагностической тактики у таких пациентов.

В статье подробно рассмотрены различные методы диагностики, используемые для выявления инфекции протезов и заплат, а также вопросы, возникающие у врачей при планировании диагностических методов, наиболее подходящих для обсследования пациентов.

Литература

  1. Голухова Е.З. Отчет о научной и лечебной работе Национального медицинского исследовательского центра сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева Минздрава России за 2022 год и перспективы дальнейшего развития Центра. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2023; Спецвыпуск (24): 5–121. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2023-24S
  2. Голухова Е.З. Отчет о научной и лечебной работе Национального медицинского исследовательского центра сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева Минздрава России за 2023 год и перспективы развития. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2024; Спецвыпуск (25): 5–141. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2024-25S
  3. Бокерия Л.А., Абдулгасанов Р.А., Гасымов Э.Г., Абдулгасанова М.Р. Протезная инфекция восходящего отдела и дуги аорты: обзор современных стратегий лечения. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2022; 23 (2): 169–182. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23-2-169-182
  4. Бокерия Л.А., Гасымов Э.Г., Абдулгасанов Р.А., Абдулгасанова М.Р. Сепсис и септический шок в сердечно-сосудистой хирургии: современные методы диагностики лечения. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2021; 18 (2): 97–108. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-2-97-108
  5. Бокерия Л.А., Абдулгасанов Р.А., Гасымов Э.Г, Аракелян В.С. Протезная инфекция нисходящего отдела грудной аорты: методы диагностики и лечения. Анналы хирургии. 2019; 24 (5): 307–319. DOI: 10.24022/1560-9502-2019-24-5-307-319
  6. Бокерия Л.А., Абдулгасанов Р.А.О., Гасымов Э.Г., Скляров В.В. Использование аутологичных вен при инфекции сосудистых протезов. Анналы хирургии. 2019; 24 (5): 333–344. DOI: 10.24022/1560-9502-2019-24-5-333-344
  7. Wouthuyzen-Bakker M., van Oosten M., Bierman W., Winter R., Glaudemans A., Slart R. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vascular graft and endograft infections: a structured clinical approach. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2023; 126: 22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.011
  8. Wilson W.R., Bower T.C., Creager M.A., Amin-Hanjani S., O’Gara P.T., Lockhart P.B. et al. Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134: e412–e460. DOI: 10.1161/ CIR.0000000000000457
  9. Gharamti A., Kanafani Z.A. Vascular graft infections an update. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2018; 32: 789–809. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.003
  10. Kilic A., Arnaoutakis D.J., Reifsnyder T., Black J.H., 3rd, Abularrage C.J., Management of infected vascular grafts. Vasc. Med. 2016; 21: 53–60. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X15612574
  11. Fitzgerald S.F., Kelly C., Humphreys H. Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: Confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005; 56: 996–999. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki382
  12. Andercou O., Marian D., Olteanu G., Stancu B., Cucuruz B., Noppeney T. Complex treatment of vascular prostheses infections. Medicine. 2018; 97: e11350. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011350
  13. Lyons O.T., Baguneid M., Barwick T.D., Bell R.E., Foster N., Homer-Vanniasinkam S. et al. Diagnosis of aortic graft infection: a case definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC). Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016; 52: 758–763. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.007
  14. Chakfé N., Diener H., Lejay A., Assadian O., Berard X., Caillon J. et al. Editor’s Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020; 59: 339–384. DOI: 410.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016
  15. Post I.C.J.H., Vos C.G. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the management of open abdominal aortic graft infections. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019; 58: 258–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.013
  16. Batt M., Feugier P., Camou F., Coffy A., Senneville E., Caillon J. et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes after in situ reconstructions for aortic graft infection. Angiology. 2018; 69: 370–379. DOI: 10.1177/0003319717710114
  17. Antonello R.M., D’Oria M., Cavallaro M., Dore F., Cova M.A., Ricciardi M.Ch. et al. Management of abdominal aortic prosthetic graft and endograft infections. A multidisciplinary update. J. Infect. Chemother. 2019; 25: 669–680. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.013
  18. Rafailidis V., Partovi S., Dikkes A., Nakamoto D.A., Azar N., Staub D. Evolving clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the abdominal aorta. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2018; 8: S118–S130. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.09.09
  19. Reinders Folmer E.I., Von Meijenfeldt G.C.I., Van der Laan M.J., Glaudemans A.W.J.M., Slart R.H.J.A. Diagnostic imaging in vascular graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018; 56: 719–729. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.010
  20. Bruggink J.L.M., Slart R.H.J.A., Pol J.A., Reijnen M.M.P.J., Zeebregts C.J. Current role of imaging in diagnosing aortic graft infections. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2011; 24: 182–190. DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2011.10.007
  21. Heikkinen L., Valtonen M., Lepäntalo M., Saimanen E., Järvinen A. Infrarenal endoluminal bifurcated stent graft infected with Listeria monocytogenes. J. Vasc. Surg. 1999; 29: 554–556. DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70285-5
  22. de Vries E.F., Roca M., Jamar F. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with 99mTc-HMPAO. Inflammation/Infection Taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010; 37 (4): 842–848. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1394-4
  23. Roca M., de Vries E.F., Jamar F., Israel O. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with 111In-oxine. Inflammation/Infection Taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010; 37: 835–841. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1393-5
  24. Erba P.A., Leo G., Sollini M., Tascini C., Boni R., Berchiolli R.N. et al. Radiolabelled leucocyte scintigraphy versus conventional radiological imaging for the management of late, low-grade vascular prosthesis infections. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014; 41: 357–368. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2582-9
  25. Glaudemans A.W., de Vries E.F., Vermeulen L.E. A large retrospective single-centre study to define the best image acquisition protocols and interpretation criteria for white blood cell scintigraphy with 99m Tc-HMPAO-labelled leucocytes in musculoskeletal infections. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2013; 40: 1760–1769. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2481-0
  26. Erba P.A., Glaudemans A.W., Veltman N.C., Sollini M., Pacilio M., Galli F. et al. Image acquisition and interpretation criteria for 99mTc- HMPAO-labelled white blood cell scintigraphy: Results of a multicenter study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014; 41: 615–623. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2631-4
  27. Annovazzi A., Bagni B., Burroni L., D’Alessandria C., Signore A. Nuclear medicine imaging of inflammatory/infective disorders of the abdomen. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2005; 26: 657–664. DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000169202.68011.47
  28. Bar-Shalom R., Yefremov N., Guralnik L., Keidar Z., Engel A., Nitecki S., Israel O. SPECT/CT using 67Ga and 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for diagnosis of infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2006; 47: 587–594.
  29. Khaja M.S., Sildiroglu O., Hagspiel K., Rehm P.K. Prosthetic vascular graft infection imaging. Clin. Imaging. 2013; 37: 239–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.07.008
  30. Roll D., Hierholzer M., Hepp W., Langer M., Zwicker C., Felix R. Diagnostic evaluation of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) using 123I-labeled monoclonal antibodies against human granulocytes (Mab-47) for the detection of prosthetic vascular graft infection. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1991; 18: 135–140. DOI: 10.1016/0883-2897(91)90060-X
  31. Cordes M., Hepp W., Pannhorst J. Vascular graft infection: detection by 123I-labeled antigranulocyte antibody (anti-NCA95) scintigraphy. Nucl. Med. 1991; 30: 173–177.
  32. Cordes M., Hepp W., Barzen G., Langer R. Diagnostic evaluation of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) with use of iodine 123-labeled antibodies against human granulocytes (123I-anti-NCA95) for the detection of prosthetic vascular graft infection. J. Vasc. Surg. 1991; 14: 703–704. DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(91)90197-3
  33. Tronco G.G., Love C., Rini J.N., Yu A.K., Bhargava K.K. Diagnosing prosthetic vascular graft infection with the antigranulocyte antibody 99mTc-fanolesomab. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2007; 28: 297–300. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328014a194
  34. Kim S.J., Lee S.W., Jeong S.Y., Pak K., Kim K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detection of infected prosthetic vascular grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 2019; 70: 307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.051
  35. Rojoa D., Kontopodis N., Antoniou S.A., Ioannou C.V., Antoniou G.A. 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of vascular prosthetic graft infection: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019; 57: 292–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.08.040
  36. Jamar F., Buscombe J., Chiti A., Christian P.E., Delbeke D., Donohoe K.J. et al. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2013; 54: 647–658. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112524
  37. Spacek M., Belohlavek O., Votrubova J., Sebesta P., Stadler P. Diagnostics of “non-acute” vascular prosthesis infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT: Our experience with 96 prostheses. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2009; 36: 850–858. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-1002-z
  38. Tokuda Y., Oshima H., Narita Y., Mutsuga M. Detection of thoracic aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013; 43: 1183–1187. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs693
  39. Guenther S.P., Cyran C.C., Rominger A., Saam T. Pichlmaier M., Hagl C., Khaladj N. The relevance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in diagnosing prosthetic graft infections post cardiac and proximal thoracic aortic surgery. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2015; 21: 450–458. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv178
  40. Chang C.Y., Chang C.P., Yang B.H., Cheng C.Y., Chang C.W. Added value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT with delayed imaging for detecting aortic graft infection: an observational study. Medicine. 2015; 94: e1124. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001124
  41. Sah B.R., Husmann L., Mayer D., Scherrer A., Rancic Z., Puippe G. et al. VASGRA Cohort. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in vascular graft infections. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015; 49: 455–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.024
  42. Wassélius J., Malmstedt J., Kalin B., Larsson S., Sundin A., Hedin U., Jacobsson H. High 18F-FDG Uptake in synthetic aortic vascular grafts on PET/ CT in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2008; 49: 1601–1605. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053462
  43. Berger P., Vaartjes I., Scholtens A., Moll F.L., De Borst G.J., De Keizer B., Bots M.L. Differential FDG-PET Uptake Patterns in Uninfected and Infected Central Prosthetic Vascular Grafts. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015; 50: 376–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.007
  44. Keidar Z., Engel A., Hoffman A., Israel O. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 2007; 48: 1230– 1236. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.040253
  45. Keidar Z., Pirmisashvili N., Leiderman M., Nitecki S., Israel O. 18F-FDG uptake in noninfected prosthetic vascular grafts: Incidence, patterns, and changes over time. J. Nucl. Med. 2014; 55: 392–395. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.128173
  46. Saleem B.R., Berger P., Vaartjes I., de Keizer B., Vonken E.J., Slart R.H. et al. Modest utility of quantitative measures in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning for the diagnosis of aortic prosthetic graft infection. J. Vasc. Surg. 2015; 61: 965–971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.005
  47. Bruggink J.L., Glaudemans A.W., Saleem B.R., Meerwaldt R., Alkefaji H., Prins T.R. Accuracy of FDG-PET-CT in the diagnostic work-up of vascular prosthetic graft infection. Eur. J. Vasc. EndoVasc. Surg. 2010; 40: 348–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.05.016
  48. Kagna O., Kurash M., Ghanem-Zoubi N., Keidar Z., Israel O. Does antibiotic treatment affect the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT studies in patients with suspected infectious processes? J. Nucl. Med. 2017; 58:
****
  1. Golukhova E.Z. Report on the scientific and clinical activity of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery for 2022 and development prospects. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2023; 24 (Special Issue) (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2023-24S
  2. Golukhova E.Z. Report on the scientific and clinical activity of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery for 2023 and development prospects. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2024; 25 (Special Issue) (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2024-25S
  3. Bockeria L.A., Abdulgasanov R.A., Gasymov E.G., Abdulgasanova M.R. Prosthetic infection of the ascending aorta and aortic arch: overview of modern treatment strategies. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022; 23 (2): 169–182 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23-2-169-182
  4. Bockeria L.A., Gasymov E.G., Abdulgasanov R.A., Abdulgasanova M.R. Sepsis and septic shock in cardio-vascular surgery: modern methods of diagnostics and treatment. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2021; 18 (2): 97–108 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-2-97-108
  5. Bockeria L.A., Abdulgasanov R.A., Gasymov E.G., Arakelyan V.S. Prosthetic infection of the descending thoracic aorta:methods of diagnosis and treatment. Russian Annals of Surgery. 2019; 24 (5): 307–319 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1560-9502-2019-24-5-307-319
  6. Bockeria L.A., Abdulgasanov R.A., Gasymov E.G., Sklyarov V.V. Using autologous veins in vascular prosthetic infection. Russian Annals of Surgery. 2019; 24 (5): 333–344 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1560-9502-2019-24-5-333-344
  7. Wouthuyzen-Bakker M., van Oosten M., Bierman W., Winter R., Glaudemans A., Slart R. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vascular graft and endograft infections: a structured clinical approach. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2023; 126: 22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.011
  8. Wilson W.R., Bower T.C., Creager M.A., Amin-Hanjani S., O’Gara P.T., Lockhart P.B. et al. Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134: e412–e460. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000457
  9. Gharamti A., Kanafani Z.A. Vascular graft infections an update. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2018; 32: 789–809. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.003
  10. Kilic A., Arnaoutakis D.J., Reifsnyder T., Black J.H., 3rd, Abularrage C.J., Management of infected vascular grafts. Vasc. Med. 2016; 21: 53–60. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X15612574
  11. Fitzgerald S.F., Kelly C., Humphreys H. Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: Confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005; 56: 996–999. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki382
  12. Andercou O., Marian D., Olteanu G., Stancu B., Cucuruz B., Noppeney T. Complex treatment of vascular prostheses infections. Medicine. 2018; 97: e11350. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011350
  13. Lyons O.T., Baguneid M., Barwick T.D., Bell R.E., Foster N., Homer-Vanniasinkam S. et al. Diagnosis of aortic graft infection: a case definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC). Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016; 52: 758–763. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.007
  14. Chakfé N., Diener H., Lejay A., Assadian O., Berard X., Caillon J. et al. Editor’s Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020; 59: 339–384. DOI: 410.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016
  15. Post I.C.J.H., Vos C.G. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the management of open abdominal aortic graft infections. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019; 58: 258–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.013
  16. Batt M., Feugier P., Camou F., Coffy A., Senneville E., Caillon J. et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes after in situ reconstructions for aortic graft infection. Angiology. 2018; 69: 370–379. DOI: 10.1177/0003319717710114
  17. Antonello R.M., D’Oria M., Cavallaro M., Dore F., Cova M.A., Ricciardi M.Ch. et al. Management of abdominal aortic prosthetic graft and endograft infections. A multidisciplinary update. J. Infect. Chemother. 2019; 25: 669–680. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.013
  18. Rafailidis V., Partovi S., Dikkes A., Nakamoto D.A., Azar N., Staub D. Evolving clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the abdominal aorta. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2018; 8: S118–S130. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.09.09
  19. Reinders Folmer E.I., Von Meijenfeldt G.C.I., Van der Laan M.J., Glaudemans A.W.J.M., Slart R.H.J.A. Diagnostic imaging in vascular graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018; 56: 719–729. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.010
  20. Bruggink J.L.M., Slart R.H.J.A., Pol J.A., Reijnen M.M.P.J., Zeebregts C.J. Current role of imaging in diagnosing aortic graft infections. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2011; 24: 182–190. DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2011.10.007
  21. Heikkinen L., Valtonen M., Lepäntalo M., Saimanen E., Järvinen A. Infrarenal endoluminal bifurcated stent graft infected with Listeria monocytogenes. J. Vasc. Surg. 1999; 29: 554–556. DOI: 10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70285-5
  22. de Vries E.F., Roca M., Jamar F. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with 99mTc-HMPAO. Inflammation/Infection Taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010; 37 (4): 842–848. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1394-4
  23. Roca M., de Vries E.F., Jamar F., Israel O. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with 111In-oxine. Inflammation/Infection Taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010; 37: 835–841. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1393-5
  24. Erba P.A., Leo G., Sollini M., Tascini C., Boni R., Berchiolli R.N. et al. Radiolabelled leucocyte scintigraphy versus conventional radiological imaging for the management of late, low-grade vascular prosthesis infections. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014; 41: 357–368. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2582-9
  25. Glaudemans A.W., de Vries E.F., Vermeulen L.E. A large retrospective single-centre study to define the best image acquisition protocols and interpretation criteria for white blood cell scintigraphy with 99m Tc-HMPAO-labelled leucocytes in musculoskeletal infections. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2013; 40: 1760–1769. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2481-0
  26. Erba P.A., Glaudemans A.W., Veltman N.C., Sollini M., Pacilio M., Galli F. et al. Image acquisition and interpretation criteria for 99mTc- HMPAO-labelled white blood cell scintigraphy: Results of a multicenter study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014; 41: 615–623. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2631-4
  27. Annovazzi A., Bagni B., Burroni L., D’Alessandria C., Signore A. Nuclear medicine imaging of inflammatory/infective disorders of the abdomen. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2005; 26: 657–664. DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000169202.68011.47
  28. Bar-Shalom R., Yefremov N., Guralnik L., Keidar Z., Engel A., Nitecki S., Israel O. SPECT/CT using 67Ga and 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for diagnosis of infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2006; 47: 587–594.
  29. Khaja M.S., Sildiroglu O., Hagspiel K., Rehm P.K. Prosthetic vascular graft infection imaging. Clin. Imaging. 2013; 37: 239–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.07.008
  30. Roll D., Hierholzer M., Hepp W., Langer M., Zwicker C., Felix R. Diagnostic evaluation of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) using 123I-labeled monoclonal antibodies against human granulocytes (Mab-47) for the detection of prosthetic vascular graft infection. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1991; 18: 135–140. DOI: 10.1016/0883-2897(91)90060-X
  31. Cordes M., Hepp W., Pannhorst J. Vascular graft infection: detection by 123I-labeled antigranulocyte antibody (anti-NCA95) scintigraphy. Nucl. Med. 1991; 30: 173–177.
  32. Cordes M., Hepp W., Barzen G., Langer R. Diagnostic evaluation of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) with use of iodine 123-labeled antibodies against human granulocytes (123I-anti-NCA95) for the detection of prosthetic vascular graft infection. J. Vasc. Surg. 1991; 14: 703–704. DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(91)90197-3
  33. Tronco G.G., Love C., Rini J.N., Yu A.K., Bhargava K.K. Diagnosing prosthetic vascular graft infection with the antigranulocyte antibody 99mTc-fanolesomab. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2007; 28: 297–300. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328014a194
  34. Kim S.J., Lee S.W., Jeong S.Y., Pak K., Kim K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detection of infected prosthetic vascular grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 2019; 70: 307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.051
  35. Rojoa D., Kontopodis N., Antoniou S.A., Ioannou C.V., Antoniou G.A. 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of vascular prosthetic graft infection: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019; 57: 292–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.08.040
  36. Jamar F., Buscombe J., Chiti A., Christian P.E., Delbeke D., Donohoe K.J. et al. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2013; 54: 647–658. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112524
  37. Spacek M., Belohlavek O., Votrubova J., Sebesta P., Stadler P. Diagnostics of “non-acute” vascular prosthesis infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT: Our experience with 96 prostheses. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2009; 36: 850–858. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-1002-z
  38. Tokuda Y., Oshima H., Narita Y., Mutsuga M. Detection of thoracic aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013; 43: 1183–1187. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs693
  39. Guenther S.P., Cyran C.C., Rominger A., Saam T. Pichlmaier M., Hagl C., Khaladj N. The relevance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in diagnosing prosthetic graft infections post cardiac and proximal thoracic aortic surgery. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2015; 21: 450–458. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv178
  40. Chang C.Y., Chang C.P., Yang B.H., Cheng C.Y., Chang C.W. Added value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT with delayed imaging for detecting aortic graft infection: an observational study. Medicine. 2015; 94: e1124. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001124
  41. Sah B.R., Husmann L., Mayer D., Scherrer A., Rancic Z., Puippe G. et al. VASGRA Cohort. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in vascular graft infections. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015; 49: 455–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.024
  42. Wassélius J., Malmstedt J., Kalin B., Larsson S., Sundin A., Hedin U., Jacobsson H. High 18F-FDG Uptake in synthetic aortic vascular grafts on PET/ CT in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2008; 49: 1601–1605. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053462
  43. Berger P., Vaartjes I., Scholtens A., Moll F.L., De Borst G.J., De Keizer B., Bots M.L. Differential FDG-PET Uptake Patterns in Uninfected and Infected Central Prosthetic Vascular Grafts. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015; 50: 376–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.007
  44. Keidar Z., Engel A., Hoffman A., Israel O. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 2007; 48: 1230– 1236. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.040253
  45. Keidar Z., Pirmisashvili N., Leiderman M., Nitecki S., Israel O. 18F-FDG uptake in noninfected prosthetic vascular grafts: Incidence, patterns, and changes over time. J. Nucl. Med. 2014; 55: 392–395. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.128173
  46. Saleem B.R., Berger P., Vaartjes I., de Keizer B., Vonken E.J., Slart R.H. et al. Modest utility of quantitative measures in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning for the diagnosis of aortic prosthetic graft infection. J. Vasc. Surg. 2015; 61: 965–971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.005
  47. Bruggink J.L., Glaudemans A.W., Saleem B.R., Meerwaldt R., Alkefaji H., Prins T.R. Accuracy of FDG-PET-CT in the diagnostic work-up of vascular prosthetic graft infection. Eur. J. Vasc. EndoVasc. Surg. 2010; 40: 348–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.05.016
  48. Kagna O., Kurash M., Ghanem-Zoubi N., Keidar Z., Israel O. Does antibiotic treatment affect the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT studies in patients with suspected infectious processes? J. Nucl. Med. 2017; 58:

Об авторах

  • Бокерия Лео Антонович, д-р мед. наук, профессор, академик РАН, президент Центра; ORCID
  • Иванов Алексей Вячеславович, врач – сердечно-сосудистый хирург, врач ультразвуковой диагностики; ORCID
  • Абдулгасанов Рамиз Алиевич, д-р мед. наук, гл. науч. сотр. отдела хирургии артериальной патологии; ORCID
  • Иванова Елена Васильевна, врач-соискатель; ORCID

 Если вы заметили опечатку, выделите текст и нажмите Alt+A