Ultrasound criteria for assessing the significance of brachiocephalic artery stenosis. Part 1. Internal carotid arteries

References

1. Скворцова В.И., Шетова И.М., Какорина Е.П., Камкин Е.Г., Бойко Е.Л. и др. Снижение смертности от острых нарушений мозгового кровообращения в результате реализации комплекса мероприятий по совершенствованию медицинской помощи пациентам с сосудистыми заболеваниями в Российской Федерации. Профилактическая медицина. 2018; 21 (1): 4–10. DOI: 10.17116/profmed20182114-10
2. Статистикийн мэдээллийн нэгдсэн сан. Эрүүл мэнд. 2021. https://www.1212.mn/mn madeelliin negdsen san. Erul mand. 2021. (in Mongolian)
3. Баасанжав Д. Улаанбаатар хотын эмнэлгүүдэд тархины инсультээс шалтгаалсан нас баралтын байдал, нас хүйсний холбогдол. Монгол улсад мэдрэл судлалын чиглэлээр гарсан зарим эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүллүүдийн эмхэтгэл. 2006 он, 81х
4. Inzitari D., Eliasziw M., Gates P., Sharpe B.L., Chan R.K., Meldrum H.E., Barnett H.J. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342 (23): 1693–1701. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200006083422302
5. Bulwa Z., Gupta A. Embolic stroke of undetermined source: The role of the nonstenotic carotid plaque. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017; 382. 49–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.09.027
6. Warlow C., Sudlow C., Dennis M., Wardlaw J., Sandercock P. Stroke. Lancet. 2003; 362 (9391); 1211–1224. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(03)14544-8
7. Убушиев С.Д., Шогенов М.А., Дарвиш Н.А. Анализ мировых тенденций в стратегии хирургического лечения пациентов с мультифокальным атеросклерозом. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2021; 1 (18): 46–52. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-1-46-52
8. Орлов И.Н. Результаты лечебной работы Института коронарной и сосудистой хирургии НМИЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева Минздрава России в 2021 г. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2022; 2 (23): 275–283. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23-2-275-283
9. Голухова Е.З. Отчет о научной и лечебной работе Национального медицинского исследовательского центра сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева Минздрава России за 2021 год и перспективы дальнейшего развития Центра. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2022; Спецвыпуск (23): 12–111. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23S
10. Голухова Е.З. Отчет о научно-медицинской работе Национального медицинского исследовательского центра сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН за 2022 год и перспективы развития. Вестник Бакулевского центра. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2023; Спецвыпуск (24): 5–111. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2023-24S
11. Flaherty M.L. Kissela B., Khoury J.C., Alwell K., Moomaw C.J., Woo D. et al. Carotid artery stenosis as a cause of stroke. Neuroepidemiology. NIH Public Access. 2013; 40 (1): 36. DOI: 10.1159/000341410
12. Den Brok M.G.H.E., Kuhrij L.S., Roozenbeek B., van der Lugt A., Hilkens P.H., Dippel D.W., Nederkoorn P.J. Prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke in the Netherlands. Eur. Stroke J. SAGE Publications. 2020; 5 (3). 271. DOI: 10.1177/2396987320932065
13. Song P., Fang Z., Wang H., Cai Y., Rahimi K., Zhu Y. et al. Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020; 8 (5): e721–e729. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30117-0
14. Бокерия Л.А., Милиевская Е.Б., Прянишников В.В., Юрлов И.А. Сердечно-сосудистая хирургия – 2022. Болезни и врожденные аномалии системы кровообращения. М.: ФГБУ «НМИЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева»; 2023. 344 с.
li>Оюун Б. Мэдрэлийн дүрс оношлогооны салбар үүсч хөгжсөн түүх. Монголын АУ. 2009; 1: 46–48.
15. Rojoa D.M., Lodhi A.Q.D., Kontopodis N., Ioannou C.V., Labropoulos N., Antoniou G.A. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of extra-cranial carotid occlusion – diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Vasa. 2020; 49 (3): 195–204. DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000850
16. Koelemay M.J.W. Nederkoorn P.J., Reitsma J.B., Majoie C.B. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke. 2004; 35 (10): 2306–2312. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000141426.63959.cc
17. Wardlaw J., Chappell F.M., Best J.J., Wartolowska K., Berry E. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367 (9521): 1503–1512. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68650-9
18. Cassola N., Baptista-Silva J.C., Nakano L.C., Flumignan C.D., Sesso R. et al. Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022; 7 (7): CD013172. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2
19. Barlinn K., Rickmann H., Kitzler H., Krogias C., Strohm H., Abramyuk A. et al. Validation of multiparametric ultrasonography criteria with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery disease: a prospective multicenter study. Ultraschall Med. 2018; 39 (5): 535–543. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119355
20. Умаров Ф.Р., Бахритдинов Ф.Ш., Суюмов А.С. Оценка результатов хирургического лечения атеросклеротического поражения внутренней сонной артерии с помощью перфузионной компьютерной томографии и транскраниальной допплерографии головного мозга. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2021; 4 (63): 43–348. DOI: 10.24022/0236-2791-2021-63-4-343-348
21. Мусаев М.К., Магамматов А.А., Мусалов А.Ю., Дарвиш Н.А., Волчкова А.А. Эндоваскулярное вмешательство при осложненной эндартерэктомии из сонной артерии. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2022; 2 (23): 230–235. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23-2-230-235
22. Alvarez-Linera J., Benito-León J., Escribano J., Campollo J., Gesto R. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. Am. Soc. Neuroradiol. 2003; 24 (5): 1012.
23. Remonda L., Senn P., Barth A., Arnold M., Lövblad K.O., Schroth G. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. American Society of Neuroradiology. 2002; 23 (2). 213.
24. Dakis K., Nana P., Athanasios C., Spanos K., Konstantinos B., Giannoukas A., Kouvelos G. Carotid plaque vulnerability diagnosis by CTA versus MRA: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4): 646. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040646
25. Cowper S.E., Kuo P.H., Bucala R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium exposure: association and lessons for idiopathic fibrosing disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 56 (10): 3173–3175. DOI: 10.1002/art.22926
26. Shen J., Karki M., Jiang T., Zhao B. Complications associated with diagnostic cerebral angiography: a retrospective analysis of 644 consecutive cerebral angiographic cases. Neurol. India. 2018; 66 (4): 1154–1158. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.237018
27. Tafelmeier S., Kesseler E., Iancu A.M., Nikoubashman O., Wiesmann M. Spectrum of complications and complication rates after diagnostic catheter angiography in neuroradiology. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2023; 33 (3): 763–768. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-023-01273-3
28. Kamtchum-Tatuene J., Noubiap J.J., Wilman A.H., Saqqur M., Shuaib A., Jickling G.C. Prevalence of high-risk plaques and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2020; 77 (12): 1524–1535. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2658
29. Шумилина М.В., Алшибая М.М., Луспаронян В.М., Дорофеев А.В., Гецадзе Г.Г. Особенности инструментальной диагностики посттравматической диссекции внутренней сонной артерии и ее спонтанного излечения. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2018; 15 (4): 267–276. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2018-15-4-267-276
30. Шумилина М.В. Особенности ультразвуковой диагностики патологии брахиоцефальных артерий в Центре им. А.Н. Бакулева. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2021; 22 (2): 184–194. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694- 2021-22-2-184-194
31. Arous E.J., Baril D.T., Robinson W.P., Aiello F.A., Hevelone N.D., Arous E.J. et al. Institutional differences in carotid artery duplex diagnostic criteria result in significant variability in classification of carotid artery stenoses and likely lead to disparities in care. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2014; 7 (3): 423–429. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000855
32. Naylor R., Rantner B., Ancetti S., de Borst G.J., De Carlo M., Halliday A. et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022; 65 (1): 7–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011
33. Poorthuis M.H.F., Sherliker P., Morris D.R., Massa M.S., Clarke R., Staplin N. et al. Development and internal validation of a risk score to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021; 61 (3): 365–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.029
34. Вачев А.Н., Терешина О.В., Дмитриев О.В., Белкин Ю.С. Прогнозирование риска повреждения миокарда при выполнении операции каротидной эндартерэктомии. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2021; 3 (18): 181–256. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-3-185-192
35. De Weerd M., Greving J.P., Hedblad B., Lorenz M.W., Mathiesen E.B., O’Leary D.H. et al. Prediction of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: identification of high risk groups. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. NIH Public Access. 2014; 45 (8): 2366– 2371. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005145
36. Шумилина М.В. Комплексная ультразвуковая диагностика патологии периферических сосудов. Учебно-методическое пособие. 2-е изд. М.: НМИЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева; 2012. 384 с.
37. Abbott A.L., Paraskevas K.I., Kakkos S.K., Golledge J., Eckstein H.H., Diaz-Sandoval L.J. et al. Systematic review of guidelines for the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2015; 46 (11): 3288–3301. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.003390
38. Pakizer D., Vybíralová A., Jonszta T., Roubec M., Král M., Chovanec V. et al. Peak systolic velocity ratio for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis correlated with plaque morphology: substudy results of the ANTIQUE study. Front Neurol. Frontiers Media SA. 2023; 14. 1206483. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1206483
39. Polak J.F., Alexandrov A.V. Accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) Carotid Doppler Velocity Criteria for Grading North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Stenosis: a meta-analysis. J. Ultrasound. Med. 2023; 42 (7): 1423–1435. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16150.
40. Gornik H.L., Rundek T., Gardener H., Benenati J.F., Dahiya N., Hamburg N.M. et al. Optimization of duplex velocity criteria for diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: a report of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing Division Carotid Diagnostic Criteria Committee. Vasc. Med. 2021; 26 (5): 515–525. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X211011253
41. Arous E.J., Judelson D.R., Malka K.T., Wyman A.S., Simons J.P., Aiello F.A. et al. Carotid duplex velocity criteria recommended by the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and endorsed by the intersocietal accreditation commission lack predictive ability for identifying high- grade carotid artery stenosis. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 20 19; 61: 227–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.051
42. Columbo J., Zwolak R.M., Arous E.J., Goodney P.P., Lilly M.P., Welch H.G. Variation in ultrasound diagnostic thresholds for carotid stenosis in the united states. Circulation. 2020; 141 (12): 946–953. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043963
43. Del Brutto V.J., Gornik H.L., Rundek T. Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis? Ann. Transl. Med. 2020; 8 (19): 1270– 1270. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1188a
44. Beach K.W., Leotta D.F., Zierler R.E. Carotid Doppler velocity measurements and anatomic stenosis: correlation is futile. Vasc. Endovascular. Surg. 2012; 46 (6): 466–474. DOI: 10.1177/1538574412452159
45. Von Reutern G.M, Goertler M.W., Bornstein N.M., Del Sette M., Evans D.H., Hetzel A. et al. Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke. 2012; 43 (3): 916–921. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636084
46. Updated Recommendations for Carotid Stenosis Interpretation Criteria- IAC Vascular Testing Communication Updated Recommendations for Carotid Stenosis Interpretation Criteria Strongly Recommended Modification of the SRU Consensus Conference Criteria for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis for Implementation in IAC-Accredited Vascular Laboratories Additional Parameters Primary Parameters. November 2023. https://intersocietal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IAC-Updated-Recommendations-for-Carotid-Stenosis-Interpretation-Criteria_11.1.23. pdf.
47. Дербилова В.П., Виноградов Р.А., Захаров Ю.Н., Борисов В.Г., Хетеева Э.Э., Виноградова Э.Р. и др. Влияние угла бифуркации общей сонной артерии на изменение параметров локальной гемодинамики. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2023; 4 (20): 371–379. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2023-20-4-371-379
48. Хетеева Э.Э., Виноградов Р.А., Захаров Ю.Н., Борисов В.Г., Зяблова Е.И., Дербилова В.П., Виноградова Э.Р. Математическое моделирование различных деформаций внутренней сонной артерии. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2023; 4 (20): 362–370. DOI: 10.24022/1814- 6910-2023-20-4-362-370
49. Дербилова В.П., Виноградов Р.А., Капран Т.И., Захаров Ю.Н., Борисов В.Г., Виноградова Э.Р. и др. Анатомия и геометрия бифуркации общей сонной артерии. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2022; 1 (19): 25–32. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2022-19-1-25-32
50. Вачёв А.Н., Степанов М.Ю., Кузнецов П.О., Климова Т.С., Фесенко Э.Н., Черепанов В.И. Шилокаротидный синдром как причина развития острой окклюзии и аневризмы внутренней сонной артерии. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2023; 3 (20): 300–307. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2023-20-3-300-307
51. Oates C.P., Naylor A.R., Hartshorne T., Charles S.M., Fail T., Humphries K. et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2009; 37 (3): 251–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015
52. Шумилина М.В. Ультразвуковые исследования при головных болях у пациентов с сердечно-сосудистой патологией. Учебно- методическое руководство. М.: ФГБУ «НМИЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева» МЗ РФ; 2022.
53. Saba L., Loewe C., Weikert T., Williams M.C., Galea N., Budde R.P.J. et al. State-of-the-art CT and MR imaging and assessment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: standardization of scanning protocols and measurements-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur. Radiol. 2023; 33 (2): 1063–1087. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09024-7
54. Kamtchum-Tatuene J., Wilman A., Saqqur M., Shuaib A., Jickling G.C. Carotid plaque with high-risk features in embolic stroke of undetermined source: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2020; 51 (1): 311–314. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027272
55. Brinjikji W., Rabinstein A.A., Lanzino G., Murad M.H., Williamson E.E., DeMarco J.K., Huston J, 3rd. Ultrasound characteristics of symptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015; 40 (3–4): 165–174. DOI: 10.1159/000437339
56. Семенов С.Е., Шатохина М.Г., Бондарчук Д.В., Молдавская И.В. К проблеме диагностики начальных проявлений недостаточности венозного церебрального кровообращения. Клиническая физиология кровообращения. 2022; 3 (19): 266–279. DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2022-19-3-266-279
57. Голухова Е.З. Результаты научной и лечебной работы Национального медицинского исследовательского центра сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева Минздрава России за 2020 год и перспективы развития. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2021; спецвыпуск (22): 5–112. DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2021-22S

1. Skvortsova V.I., Shetova I.M., Kakorina E.P., Kamkin E.G., Boyko E.L. et al. Reduction of mortality from acute cerebrovascular accidents as a result of the implementation of a set of measures to improve medical care for patients with vascular diseases in the Russian Federation. Preventive Medicine. 2018; 21(1): 4–10 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/profmed20182114-10
2. Статистикийн мэдээллийн нэгдсэн сан. Эрүүл мэнд. 2021. https://www.1212.mn/mn Statisticin madeelliin negdsen san. Erul mand. 2021. https://www.1212.mn/mn (in Mongolian)
3. Баасанжав Д. Улаанбаатар хотын эмнэлгүүдэд тархины инсультээс шалтгаалсан нас баралтын байдал, нас хүйсний холбогдол. Монгол улсад мэдрэл судлалын чиглэлээр гарсан зарим эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүллүүдийн эмхэтгэл. 2006 он, 81х
4. Baasanjav D. Ulaanbaatar hotyn emnelgүүded tarkhin strokees shaltgaalsan us baraltyn baidal, us hүysnyy kholbogdol. A compilation of some scientific articles on neuroscience in Mongolia. 2006 he, 81х (in Mongolian).
5. Inzitari D., Eliasziw M., Gates P., Sharpe B.L., Chan R.K., Meldrum H.E., Barnett H.J. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342 (23): 1693–1701. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200006083422302
6. Bulwa Z., Gupta A. Embolic stroke of undetermined source: The role of the nonstenotic carotid plaque. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017; 382. 49–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.09.027
7. Warlow C., Sudlow C., Dennis M., Wardlaw J., Sandercock P. Stroke. Lancet. 2003; 362 (9391); 1211–1224. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(03)14544-8
8. Ubushiev S.D., Shogenov M.A., Darvish N.A. Analysis of global trends in the strategy of surgical treatment of patients with multifocal atherosclerosis. Clinical Physiology of Circulaiton. 2021; 1 (18): 46–52 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-1-46-52
9. Orlov I.N. Results of the medical work of the Institute of Coronary and Vascular Surgery of the A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center of Cardiovascular Surgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in 2021. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022; 2 (23): 275–283 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23-2-275-283
10. Golukhova E.Z. Report on the scientific and medical work of the National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery named after A.N. Bakulev of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for 2021 and prospects for further development of the Center. The Bulletin of Ba koulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022; Special issue (23): 12–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23S
11. Golukhova E.Z. Report on the scientific and medical work of the National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery named after A.N. Bakulev of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for 2022 and development prospects. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2023; Special issue (24): 5–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2023-24S
12. Flaherty M.L. Kissela B., Khoury J.C., Alwell K., Moomaw C.J., Woo D. et al. Carotid artery stenosis as a cause of stroke. Neuroepidemiology. NIH Public Access. 2013; 40 (1): 36. DOI: 10.1159/000341410
13. Den Brok M.G.H.E., Kuhrij L.S., Roozenbeek B., van der Lugt A., Hilkens P.H., Dippel D.W., Nederkoorn P.J. Prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke in the Netherlands. Eur. Stroke J. SAGE Publications. 2020; 5 (3). 271. DOI: 10.1177/2396987320932065
14. Song P., Fang Z., Wang H., Cai Y., Rahimi K., Zhu Y. et al. Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020; 8 (5): e721–e729. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30117-0
15. Bockeria L.A., Milievskaya E.B., Pryanishnikov V.V., Yurlov I.A. Cardiovascular surgery – 2022. Diseases and congenital anomalies of the circulatory system. Moscow; 2023. 344 p. (in Russ.).
16. Oyuun B. Madreliyn durs onoshloony salbar үүсч үгжсөн үүх. Mongolyn AU. 2009; 1: 46–48 (in Mongolian).
17. Rojoa D.M., Lodhi A.Q.D., Kontopodis N., Ioannou C.V., Labropoulos N., Antoniou G.A. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of extra-cranial carotid occlusion – diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Vasa. 2020; 49 (3): 195–204. DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000850
18. Koelemay M.J.W. Nederkoorn P.J., Reitsma J.B., Majoie C.B. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke. 2004; 35 (10): 2306–2312. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000141426.63959.cc
19. Wardlaw J., Chappell F.M., Best J.J., Wartolowska K., Berry E. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367 (9521): 1503–1512. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68650-9
20. Cassola N., Baptista-Silva J.C., Nakano L.C., Flumignan C.D., Sesso R. et al. Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022; 7 (7): CD013172. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2
21. Barlinn K., Rickmann H., Kitzler H., Krogias C., Strohm H., Abramyuk A. et al. Validation of multiparametric ultrasonography criteria with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery disease: a prospective multicenter study. Ultraschall Med. 2018; 39 (5): 535–543. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119355
22. Umarov F.R., Bakhritdinov F.Sh., Suyumov A.S. Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the internal carotid artery using perfusion computed tomography and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the brain. Grudnaya I Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2021; 4 (63): 43–348 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/0236-2791-2021-63-4-343-348
23. Musaev M.K., Magammatov A.A., Musalov A.Yu., Darvish N.A., Volchkova A.A. Endovascular intervention during complicated endarterectomy from the carotid artery. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022; 2 (23): 230–235 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23-2-230-235
24. Alvarez-Linera J., Benito-León J., Escribano J., Campollo J., Gesto R. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. Am. Soc. Neuroradiol. 2003; 24 (5): 1012.
25. Remonda L., Senn P., Barth A., Arnold M., Lövblad K.O., Schroth G. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. American Society of Neuroradiology. 2002; 23 (2). 213.
26. Dakis K., Nana P., Athanasios C., Spanos K., Konstantinos B., Giannoukas A., Kouvelos G. Carotid plaque vulnerability diagnosis by CTA versus MRA: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4): 646. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040646
27. Cowper S.E., Kuo P.H., Bucala R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium exposure: association and lessons for idiopathic fibrosing disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 56 (10): 3173–3175. DOI: 10.1002/art.22926
28. Shen J., Karki M., Jiang T., Zhao B. Complications associated with diagnostic cerebral angiography: a retrospective analysis of 644 consecutive cerebral angiographic cases. Neurol. India. 2018; 66 (4): 1154–1158. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.237018
29. Tafelmeier S., Kesseler E., Iancu A.M., Nikoubashman O., Wiesmann M. Spectrum of complications and complication rates after diagnostic catheter angiography in neuroradiology. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2023; 33 (3): 763–768. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-023-01273-3
30. Kamtchum-Tatuene J., Noubiap J.J., Wilman A.H., Saqqur M., Shuaib A., Jickling G.C. Prevalence of high-risk plaques and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2020; 77 (12): 1524–1535. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2658
31. Shumilina M.V., Alshibaya M.M., Lusparonyan V.M., Dorofeev A.V., Getsadze G.G. Features of instrumental diagnostics of posttraumatic dissection of the internal carotid artery and its spontaneous healing. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2018; 15 (4): 267–276 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022 /1814-6910-2018-15-4-267-276
32. Shumilina M.V. Features of ultrasound diagnostics of brachiocephalic artery pathology at the A.N. Bakulev Center. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2021; 22 (2): 184–194 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2021-22-2-184-194
33. Arous E.J., Baril D.T., Robinson W.P., Aiello F.A., Hevelone N.D., Arous E.J. et al. Institutional differences in carotid artery duplex diagnostic criteria result in significant variability in classification of carotid artery stenoses and likely lead to disparities in care. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2014; 7 (3): 423–429. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000855
34. Naylor R., Rantner B., Ancetti S., de Borst G.J., De Carlo M., Halliday A. et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022; 65 (1): 7–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011
35. Poorthuis M.H.F., Sherliker P., Morris D.R., Massa M.S., Clarke R., Staplin N. et al. Development and internal validation of a risk score to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021; 61 (3): 365–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.029
36. Vachev A.N., Tereshina O.V., Dmitriev O.V., Belkin Yu.S. Predicting the risk of myocardial damage during carotid endarterectomy surgery. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2021; 3 (18): 181–256 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-3-185-192
37. De Weerd M., Greving J.P., Hedblad B., Lorenz M.W., Mathiesen E.B., O’Leary D.H. et al. Prediction of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: identification of high risk groups. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. NIH Public Access. 2014; 45 (8): 2366– 2371. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005145
38. Shumilina M.V. Complex ultrasound diagnostics of peripheral vascular pathology. Teaching aid. 2nd ed. Moscow; 2012. 384 p. (in Russ.).
39. Abbott A.L., Paraskevas K.I., Kakkos S.K., Golledge J., Eckstein H.H., Diaz-Sandoval L.J. et al. Systematic review of guidelines for the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2015; 46 (11): 3288–3301. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.003390
40. Pakizer D., Vybíralová A., Jonszta T., Roubec M., Král M., Chovanec V. et al. Peak systolic velocity ratio for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis correlated with plaque morphology: substudy results of the ANTIQUE study. Front Neurol. Frontiers Media SA. 2023; 14. 1206483. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1206483
41. Polak J.F., Alexandrov A.V. Accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) Carotid Doppler Velocity Criteria for Grading North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Stenosis: a meta-analysis. J. Ultrasound. Med. 2023; 42 (7): 1423–1435. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16150.
42. Gornik H.L., Rundek T., Gardener H., Benenati J.F., Dahiya N., Hamburg N.M. et al. Optimization of duplex velocity criteria for diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: a report of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing Division Carotid Diagnostic Criteria Committee. Vasc. Med. 2021; 26 (5): 515–525. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X211011253
43. Arous E.J., Judelson D.R., Malka K.T., Wyman A.S., Simons J.P., Aiello F.A. et al. Carotid duplex velocity criteria recommended by the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and endorsed by the intersocietal accreditation commission lack predictive ability for identifying high- grade carotid artery stenosis. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 20 19; 61: 227–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.051
44. Columbo J., Zwolak R.M., Arous E.J., Goodney P.P., Lilly M.P., Welch H.G. Variation in ultrasound diagnostic thresholds for carotid stenosis in the united states. Circulation. 2020; 141 (12): 946–953. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043963
45. Del Brutto V.J., Gornik H.L., Rundek T. Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis? Ann. Transl. Med. 2020; 8 (19): 1270– 1270. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1188a
46. Beach K.W., Leotta D.F., Zierler R.E. Carotid Doppler velocity measurements and anatomic stenosis: correlation is futile. Vasc. Endovascular. Surg. 2012; 46 (6): 466–474. DOI: 10.1177/1538574412452159
47. Von Reutern G.M, Goertler M.W., Bornstein N.M., Del Sette M., Evans D.H., Hetzel A. et al. Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke. 2012; 43 (3): 916–921. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636084
48. Updated Recommendations for Carotid Stenosis Interpretation Criteria- IAC Vascular Testing Communication Updated Recommendations for Carotid Stenosis Interpretation Criteria Strongly Recommended Modification of the SRU Consensus Conference Criteria for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis for Implementation in IAC-Accredited Vascular Laboratories Additional Parameters Primary Parameters. November 2023. https://intersocietal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IAC-Updated-Recommendations-for-Carotid-Stenosis-Interpretation-Criteria_11.1.23. pdf.
49. Derbilova V.P., Vinogradov R.A., Zakharov Yu.N., Borisov V.G., Kheteeva E.E., Vinogradova E.R. et al. The influence of the bifurcation angle of the common carotid artery on changes in local hemodynamic parameters. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2023; 4 (20): 371–379 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2023-20-4-371-379
50. Kheteeva E.E., Vinogradov R.A., Zakharov Yu.N., Borisov V.G., Zyablova E.I., Derbilova V.P., Vinogradova E.R. Mathematical modeling of various deformations of the internal carotid artery. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2023; 4 (20): 362–370 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814- 6910-2023-20-4-362-370
51. Derbilova V.P., Vinogradov R.A., Kapran T.I., Zakharov Yu.N., Borisov V.G., Vinogradova E.R. et al. Anatomy and geometry of the bifurcation of the common carotid artery. Clinical Physiology of Blood Circulation. 2022; 1 (19): 25–32. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814- 6910-2022-19-1-25-32
52. Vachev A.N., Stepanov M.Yu., Kuznetsov P.O., Klimova T.S., Fesenko E.N., Cherepanov V.I. Stylocarotid syndrome as a cause of acute occlusion and aneurysm of the internal carotid artery. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2023; 3 (20): 300–307 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2023-20-3-300-307
53. Oates C.P., Naylor A.R., Hartshorne T., Charles S.M., Fail T., Humphries K. et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2009; 37 (3): 251–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015
54. Shumilina M.V. Ultrasound examinations for headaches in patients with cardiovascular pathology. Educational and methodological guide. Moscow; 2022. (in Russ.).
55. Saba L., Loewe C., Weikert T., Williams M.C., Galea N., Budde R.P.J. et al. State-of-the-art CT and MR imaging and assessment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: standardization of scanning protocols and measurements-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur. Radiol. 2023; 33 (2): 1063–1087. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09024-7
56. Kamtchum-Tatuene J., Wilman A., Saqqur M., Shuaib A., Jickling G.C. Carotid plaque with high-risk features in embolic stroke of undetermined source: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2020; 51 (1): 311–314. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027272
57. Brinjikji W., Rabinstein A.A., Lanzino G., Murad M.H., Williamson E.E., DeMarco J.K., Huston J, 3rd. Ultrasound characteristics of symptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015; 40 (3–4): 165–174. DOI: 10.1159/000437339
58. Semenov S.E., Shatokhina M.G., Bondarchuk D.V., Moldavskaya I.V. On the problem of diagnostics of initial manifestations of venous cerebral circulation insufficiency. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2022; 3 (19): 266–279 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2022-19- 3-266-279
59. Golukhova E.Z. The results of scientific and clinical activities of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery in 2020 and development prospects. The Bulletin of Bakoulev Center. Cardiovascular Diseases. 2021; 22 (Special Issue) (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1810-0694-2021-22S

About Authors

• Amarzhargal Gansukh, Associate Professor, Researcher, Ultrasonic Diagnostician and Neuroradiology Doctor; ORCID
• Oyuun Byambazhav, Cand. Med. Sci., Professor, Ultrasonic Diagnostician and Neuroradiology Doctor; ORCID
• Margarita V. Shumilina, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor of Chair, Head of Department, Ultrasonic Diagnostician; ORCID
• Ivan N. Shchanitsyn, Cand. Med. Sci., Researcher, Cardiovascular Surgeon; ORCID