Clinical Physiology of Circulation

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery


Clinical status assessment of a female patient with doublethe normal body mass index and with a severe valve prosthesis/patientmismatch 15 years after the mitral and aortic valves replacementwith st. jude medical standard mechanical prostheses

Authors: D.M. Pelekh, T.G. Nikitina, A.A. Fadeev, I.I. Skopin, M.G. Izosimova

Company:
Bakoulev National Scientific and Practical Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rublevskoe shosse, 135, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation

E-mail: Сведения доступны для зарегистрированных пользователей.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1814-6910-2017-14-3-170-177

UDC: 616-056.52:616.126.42+616.126.52]-089

Link: Clinical Physiology of Blood Circulaiton. 2017; 14 (3): 170-177

Quote as: Pelekh D.M., Nikitina T.G., Fadeev A.A., Skopin I.I., Izosimova M.G. Clinical status assessment of a female patient with double the normal body mass index and with a severe valve prosthesis/patient mismatch 15 years after the mitral and aortic valves replacement with St. Jude Medical Standard mechanical prostheses. Klinicheskaya Fiziologiya Krovoobrashcheniya (Clinical Physiology of Circulation, Russian journal). 2017; 14 (3): 170–7 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/1814-6910-2017-14-3-170-177

Received / Accepted:  04.07.2017/12.07.2017

Full text:  

Abstract

The female patient is 40 years old with rheumatic mitral-aortic defect and insufficiency of both valves 15 years ago in 2002 two-valves prosthetics by mechanical artificial limbs of St. Jude Medical of the Standard model the sizes 27 and 23 of mm was done. At the time of operation the weight of the patient was 97 kg, the body surface area (BSA) 2.4 m2, the body weight index (BWI) 34.4 kg/m2. Now her weight is 125 kg, BSA 2.69 m2, BWI 44.3 kg/m2. Now the values of valve prosthesis/patient mismatch have become severe on both mitral and aortic prostheses: 0.62 (<0.9)/0.59 (<0.6). The values of transprosthetic gradients have become much higher; the mass of a myocardium of left ventricle appears to be in a tendency to growth. The patient has manifestations of symptoms of heart failure.

References

1. Rahimtoola S.H. The problem of valve prosthesispatient
mismatch. Circulation. 1978; 58: 20–4.
2. Daneshuar S.A., Rahimtoola S.H. Valve prosthesis
patient mismatch (VP–PM): a long-term perspective.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 60 (13): 1123–35.
3. Rahimtoola S.H. Determining that aortic valve stenosis
is severe: back to the future. Physical examination and
aortic valve area index/energy loss index ≤0.6 cm2/m2.
Editorial comment. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Cardiovasc.
Imaging. 2010; 3 (6): 563–6.
4. Пелех Д.М., Цискаридзе И.М., Никитина Т.Г., Изо-
симова М.Г., Муратов Р.М., Скопин И.И., Боке-
рия Л.А. Оценка гемодинамических параметров
двустворчатых механических протезов «МедИнж-2»
и «St. Jude Medical» в отдаленные сроки после кор-
рекции аортального стеноза. Клиническая физиоло-
гия кровообращения. 2014; 2: 19–24. [Pelekh D.M.,
Tsiskaridze I.M., Nikitina T.G., Izosimova M.G., Muratov
R.M., Skopin I.I., Bockeria L.A. Assessment of
bileaflet mechanical prostheses “Medeng-2” and “St.
Jude Medical” hemodynamics in late follow-up after
correction of aortic stenosis. Klinicheskaya Fiziologiya
Krovoobrashcheniya (Clinical Physiology of Circulation,
Russian journal). 2014; 2: 19–24 (in Russ.).]
5. Пелех Д.М. Актуальные проблемы протезирования
аортального клапана двустворчатыми механичес-
кими протезами. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Баку-
лева РАМН. 2014; 15 (1): 4–14. [Pelekh D.M. Some
topical problems of aortic valve replacement by
mechanical bileaflet prostheses. Byulleten’ Nauchnogo
Tsentra Serdechno-Sosudistoy Khirurgii imeni A.N. Bakuleva
Rossiyskoy Academii Meditsinskikh Nauk (Bulletin
of A.N. Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular
Surgery of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Russian
journal). 2014; 15 (1): 4–14 (in Russ.).]
6. Бокерия Л.А., Фадеев А.А., Махачев О.А., Мельни-
ков А.П., Бондаренко И.Э. Механические протезы
клапанов сердца. М.: НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева
РАМН; 2013. [Bockeria L.A., Fadeev A.A., Makhachev
O.A., Mel’nikov A.P., Bondarenko I.E. Mechanical
valve prostheses. Moscow; 2013 (in Russ.).]
7. Бокерия Л.А., Фадеев А.А., Махачев О.А., Мельни-
ков А.П. Алгоритм персонального выбора механи-
ческого протеза клапана сердца для больных с врож-
денными и приобретенными пороками. В кн.:
Инновационные имплантаты в хирургии. М.; 2014:
247–8. [Bockeria L.A., Fadeev A.A., Makhachev O.A.,
Mel’nikov A.P. The algorithm for personal selection of
mechanical heart valve prosthesis for patients with congenital
and acquired heart diseases. In: Innovative
implants in surgery. Moscow; 2014: 247–8 (in Russ.).]
8. Бокерия Л.А., Махачев О.А., Фадеев А.А. и др.
Протокол для расчета количественных параметров
при протезировании клапанов сердца. Бюллетень
НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2007; 8 (3): 14.
[Bockeria L.A., Makhachev O.A., Fadeev A.A. et al.
Protocol for calculating the quantitative parameters for
heart valve replacement. Byulleten’ Nauchnogo Tsentra
Serdechno-Sosudistoy Khirurgii imeni A.N. Bakuleva
Rossiyskoy Academii Meditsinskikh Nauk (Bulletin of
A.N. Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular
Surgery of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Russian
journal). 2007; 8 (3): 14 (in Russ.).]
9. Castro L.J., Arcidi J.M., Fisher A.L., Gaudiani V.A.
Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive
strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann. Thorac. Surg.
2002; 74: 31–6.
10. Бокерия Л.А., Бокерия О.Л., Фадеев А.А., Маха-
чев О.А., Косарева Т.И., Аверина И.И. Оценка кон-
структивного стеноза механических клапанов серд-
ца у взрослых в аортальной позиции: преимущество
полнопроточного протеза клапана сердца. Вестник
Российской академии медицинских наук. 2013; 3:
51–8. [Bockeria L.A., Bockeria O.L., Fadeev A.A.,
Makhachev O.A., Kosareva T.I., Averina I.I. Assessment
of mechanical heart valve constructive stenosis in
adults in the aortic position: advantage all-flow design
of heart valve prosthesis. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii
Meditsinskikh Nauk (Annals of the Russian Academy
Medical Sciences). 2013; 3: 51–8 (in Russ.).]
11. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Prosthetic heart valves: selection
of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management.
Circulation. 2009; 119: 1034–48.
12. Rahimtoola S.H. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in
adults. An update. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010; 55 (22):
2413–26.
13. Chen J., Lin Y., Kang B., Wang Z. Indexed effective
orifice area is a significant predictor of higher mid- and
long-term mortality rates following aortic valve replacement
in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch. Eur.
J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2014; 45 (2): 234–40.
14. Li M., Dumesnil J.G., Mathieu P. et al. Impact of valve
prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial
pressure after mitral valve replacement. J. Am. Coll.
Cardiol. 2005; 45 (7): 1034–40.
15. Mohty D., Dumesnil J.G., Echahidi N., Mathieu P.,
Dagenais F., Voisine P., Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesispatient
mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve
replacement. Influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular
dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 53 (1): 39–47.
16. Collis T., Devereux R.B., Roman M.J., De Simone G.,
Yeh J.L., Howard B.V. et al. Relations of stroke volume
and cardiac output to body composition. The strong
heart study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 820–5.
17. Head S.J., Mokhles M.M., Osnabrugge R.L.J., Pibarot P.,
Mack M.J., Takkenberg J.J.M. et al. The impact of
prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival after
aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and metaanalysis
of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186
patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur. Heart J. 2012;
33: 1518–29.
18. Rosenhek R., Binder T., Maurer G., Baumgartner H.
Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment
of heart valve prostheses. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.
2003; 16: 1116–27.
19. Bleiziffer S., Eichinger W.B., Hettich I., Guenzinger R.,
Ruzicka D., Bauernschmitt R., Lange R. Prediction of
valve prosthesis–patient mismatch prior to aortic valve
replacement: which is the best method? Heart. 2007; 93:
615–20.
20. Guazzi M., Adams V., Conraads V. Clinical recommendations
for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data
assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation.
2012; 126: 2261–74.

About Authors

  • Pelekh Dmitriy Mikhaylovich, Cand. Med. Sc., Researcher; orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-3296
  • Nikitina Tat’yana Georgievna, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of Department of Cardiology Acquired Heart Disease; orcid.org/0000-0003-4656-6299
  • Fadeev Aleksandr Alekseevich, Cand. Tech. Sc., Head of Laboratory for the Application of Polymers in Cardiovascular Surgery; orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-0027
  • Skopin Ivan Ivanovich, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of Department of Reconstructive Surgery of Cardiac Valves and Coronary Arteries, Director of the Institute of Coronary and Vascular Surgery, Bakoulev NSPCCS; orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-202X
  • Izosimova Mariya Grigor’evna, Ultrasonic Diagnostics Physician; orcid.org/0000-0001-6588-9072

 If you found mistakes, select text and press Alt+A