Clinical Physiology of Circulation

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery


Quality of life of patients aged 80 years and older with critical aortic stenosisafter aortic valve replacement under extracorporeal circulation

Authors: I.E. Olofinskaya, I.I. Skopin, R.M. Muratov, S.F. Nikonov, P.V. Kakhktsyan, S.I. Babenko, M.M. Nersisyan

Company:
A.N. Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russia, Rublevskoe shosse, 135, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation

E-mail: Сведения доступны для зарегистрированных пользователей.

Link: Clinical Physiology of Blood Circulaiton. 2015; (): -

Quote as: Olofinskaya I.E., Skopin I.I., Muratov R.M., Nikonov S.F., Kakhktsyan P.V., Babenko S.I., Nersisyan M.M.. Quality of life of patients aged 80 years and older with critical aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement under extracorporeal circulation. Klinicheskaya Fiziologiya Krovoobrashcheniya (Clinical Physiology of Circulation, Russian journal). 2015; 3: 27-33 (in Russ.)

Full text:  

Abstract

Material and methods. The study included 12 patients including 4 men (33.3%) and 8 women (66.7%) after aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting. The mean age of patients was 82,4±1,9. The average EuroSCORE rate for the group was 9,07 ± 2,59. To study the quality of life we used two kinds of questionnaires: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. The survey was carried out of patients before and after surgery via 6, 12, 18, 24 months.

Results. Hospital mortality was not observed. Our study showed significant improvement of the main indicators of the QOL and functional status of patients. The study revealed positive dynamics of functional class (FC) of the group. In most patients (83.3%) after surgery was determined FC I–II (1,8 ± 0,75 for FC NYHA), whereas prior to operation it was 3,25 ± 0,7 an average for the group. According to the results of the survey for the whole period of follow-up we obtained good results in the evaluation of all spheres of life of patients, compared with the original data.

Conclusions. The study showed the positive experience of the surgical treatment of critical aortic stenosis in patients over the 80 years. The study of QOL in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement under extracorporeal circulation is a perspective direction of modern medicine and requires further development.

References

  1. Олофинская И.Е. Результаты хирургического лечения приобретенных пороков сердца у больных пожилого возраста: факторы риска, прогноз. Дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2009.
  2. Миллер О., Мурсалимова А., Гендлин Г., Сторожаков Г. Лечение аортального стеноза у пожилых па- циентов. Врач. 2011; 11: 2–8.
  3. Бокерия Л.А., Никонов С.Ф., Олофинская И.Е. Хирургическое лечение заболеваний сердца у больных пожилого возраста: современные подходы к лечению, качество жизни и прогноз. М.: НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН; 2012.
  4. Vahanian А., Alfieri О., Andreotti F., Antunes J.V., Esquivias B.G., Baumgartner H. et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur. Heart J. 2012; 33: 2451–96.
  5. Vasques F., Messori A., Lucenteforte E., Biancari F. Immediate and late outcome of patients aged 80 years and older undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 studies. Am. Heart J. 2012; 163 (3): 477–85.
  6. Бокерия Л.А., Олофинская И.Е., Никонов С.Ф. Современные аспекты хирургического лечения клапанной патологии сердца у больных пожилого возраста: актуальные вопросы, новые технологии. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2011; 3: 43–7.
  7. Олофинская И.Е., Гончарук Ю.В. Качество жизни больных пожилого возраста после хирургической коррекции аортального порока сердца. Креативная кардиология. 2012; 2: 13–21.
  8. Roques F., Michel P., Goldstone A.R., Nashef S.A. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur. Heart J. 2003; 24 (9): 882–3.
  9. Roques F., Nashef S.A., Michel P., Gauducheau E., de Vincentiis C., Baudet et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1999; 15 (6): 816–22.
  10. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item Short form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992; 30 (6): 473–83.
  11. Ware J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinsi M., Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and interpretation Guide. Boston. MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1993.
  12. Rector T.S., Kubo S.H., Cohn J.N. Patients self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire. J. Heart Failure. 1987; 10: 198–209.
  13. Вишневский А.Г. Демографические вызовы нового века. Демографический ежегодник России. 2010; 159: 110–5.
  14. Carrascal Y., Valenzuela H., Laguna G., Pareja P., Blanco M., Ortega C. Aortic valve surgery in octogenarians: Risk factors and long-term impact. Rev. Clin. Esp. 2015; 215 (3): 148–55.
  15. Wang T.K., Sathananthan J., Chieng N., Gamble G.D., Haydock D. A., Ruygrok P.N. Aortic valve replacement in over 70- and over 80-year olds: 5-year cohort study. Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2014; 22: 526–33.
  16. Ditchfield J.A., Granger E., Spratt Ph., Jansz P., Dhital K., Farnsworth A., Hayward Ch. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Heart Lung Circ. 2014; 23 (9): 841–6.
  17. Бокерия Л.А., Скопин И.И., Никонов С.Ф., Муратов Р.М., Олофинская И.Е. Пожилой возраст как фактор риска при операциях на открытом сердце. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2007; 3: 9–12.
  18. Муратов Р.М., Олофинская И.Е., Бабенко С.И., Нерсисян М.М. Хирургическое лечение критического аортального стеноза в условиях искусственного кровообращения у пациентки 86 лет: результаты лечения и качество жизни через год после опера- ции. Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. 2014; 15 (6): 64–8.
  19. Lung В., Cachier А., Baron G., Messika-Zeitoun D., Delahaye F., Tornos Р. et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur. Heart J. 2005; 26: 2714–20.
  20. Sundt T.M., Bailey M.S., Moon M.R., Mendeloff E.N., Huddleston C.B., Pasque M.K. et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000; 102 (3): 70–4.
  21. . Shan L., Saxena A., McMahon R., Wilson A., Newcomb A. A systematic review on the quality of life benefits after aortic valve replacement in the elderly. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013; 145 (5): 1173–89.
  22. Nagarajan K., Chnaris A., Israr M., Jayia P., Mahboob S., Neville A., Luckraz H. Long term outcomes and quality of life in octogenarians after complex valve surgery. 2014 Annual Meeting. Abstracts. http://heartvalveconference. com/2014/AS3.cgi.

 If you found mistakes, select text and press Alt+A