Clinical Physiology of Circulation

Chief Editor

Leo A. Bockeria, MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, President of Bakoulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery


Сравнительная характеристика гидродинамических показателей биопротезов клапанов сердца «ЮНИЛАЙН» и «ПЕРИКОР»

E-mail: Сведения доступны для зарегистрированных пользователей.

Link: Clinical Physiology of Blood Circulaiton. 2013; (): -

Full text:  

Abstract

Objective. To conduct a comparative evaluation of hydronamic data of native xenoaortic bioprostheses PeriCor and xenopericardial bioprostheses UniLine.
Material and methods. In vitro study included 16 bioprostheses PeriCor and 14 bioprostheses UniLine with the diameter of 28 mm suitable for clinical use. The study was carried out in pulsatile flow Vivitro Labs Inc. (Canada), modeling physiological work of the mitral valve.
Results. Median of the peak transprosthetic gradient in the group of bioprostheses UniLine amounted to 5.3 mm Hg, in the group of bioprostheses PeriCor amounted to 6.1 mm Hg. Mean transprosthetic gradient in the group of bioprostheses UniLine amounted to 3.0 mm Hg and in the group of bioprostheses PeriCor amounted to 2.8 mm Hg. Efficient opening area value in the group of bioprostheses UniLine amounted to 2.3 cm2, in the group of bioprostheses PeriCor 2.6 cm2. Here in efficiency index was 37.4 and 42.2% respectively. Total regurgitation volume was 2.7 ml per cycle in the group of bioprostheses PeriCor and 3.4 ml in the group of bioprostheses UniLine.
Conclusion. Statistically significant differences between these types of bioprostheses in the context of hydrodynamic parameters were not revealed as a result of the studies. Hydrodynamic parameters of both groups of bioprotheses are comparable with world analogues data. Incomplete opening and excessive tension of UniLine bioprosthesis valvular apparatus leading to insignificant constructional stenosing effect was fixed. This fact indicates rework possibility of valvular apparatus and support frame to improve hydrodynamic parameters.

References

Все исследуемые материалы предоставлены ФГБУ «НИИ комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний» СО РАМН.
Барбараш Л. С., Барбараш Н. А., Журавлева И. Ю. Биопротезы клапанов сердца: проблемы и перспективы. Кемерово: Кемер. полиграфкомбинат, 1995. 400 с.
Биологический протез клапана сердца. Патент на полезную модель РФ № 76565 от 27.09.2008 г.
Гюнтер В.Э., Ходоренко В.Н., Ясенчук Ю.Я. и др. Никелид титана. Медицинский материал нового поколения. Томск: НПП «МИЦ», 2006. 296 с.
Журавлева И. Ю., Глушкова Т. В., Веремеев А. В. и др. Применение аминодифосфоната для профилактики кальцификации эпоксиобработанных биопротезов // Патол. кровообр. и кардиохир. 2010. № 2. C. 18-21.
Мушин В.Г., Кондратьев В.В., Хачин В.Н. Предпереходные явления и мартенситные превращения. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 1998. 368 c.
Орловский П.П., Гриценко В.В., Юхнев А.Д. и др. Искусственные клапаны сердца. Гидродинамика искусственных клапанов сердца. М., 2007. 448 c.
Ajit P. Yoganathan, Zhaoming He, Casey J. S. Fluid mechanics of heart valves // Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2004. Vol. 6. P. 331-362.
Bernacca G.M., McColl J.H., Wheatley D.J. Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: Objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2004. Vol. 13. P. 467-477.
Braunwald E., Zipes D. P., Libby P. W. B. Valvular heart disease // Heart disease a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 6th ed. / Eds Saunders Company, 2001. 2297 p.
Brendan P. The human heart: A basic guide to heart disease. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007. 240 p.
Chaudhry M.A., Raco L., Muriithi E. W. et al. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: Eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2000. Vol. 9. P. 429-438.
Guangqiang G., YingXing Wu, Grunkemeier L. G. et al. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004. Vol. 44 (2). P. 384-388.
ISO 5840:2005 Cardiovascular implants - Cardiac valve prostheses.
Mirza A., Ayegnon K. G., Aupart M. et al. A 25-year experience with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount in the mitral position // Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2011. Vol. 19. P. 14-19.
Rashtian M.Y., Stevenson D.M., Allen D.T. et al. Flow characteristics of bioprosthetic heart valves // Chest. 1990. Vol. 98. P. 365-375.
Sundararajan V.M. Principles of biomedical engineering. Artech House, 2010. P. 481.

 If you found mistakes, select text and press Alt+A